Should the death penalty be abolished?

, , Leave a comment

The death penalty is one form of capital punishment and is a state-sanctioned punishment for killing a person for a crime. The execution of the penalty is done by a court of law for a criminal offense. It was established in the 18th century BCE, and the Code of King Hammurabi established the first death penalty.

The people convicted of the death penalty are proven to be terrorists, or for other criminal punishment that are related to many other aspects of our society.The death penalty seems to be more harmful to the justice system than helpful. The crimes punishable by death vary significantly over the years, and the methods of execution also vary for all crimes in different areas of the world.

Countries have been gradually abolishing the death penalty for many years, and now more than 70% of the world’s countries have abolished the death penalty. With a reflection of bad syllogism, to term the punishment, in the case of the death penalty, the court makes sure caution is exercised by giving the punishment. There are objectives to help execute in abolishing the death penalty.

The major reasons for abolishing the death penalty include:

  • It is irreversible.

The death penalty is something that, when sentenced, cannot be taken back. Absolute judgments might lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. Since the vast majority of executions have taken place, the death penalty has carried out at least a way to clear out more logical options.

  • It does not reduce crime.

There is no fine evidence that the death penalty put off crime more effectively. Since the abolishment of the death penalty in 1976 in Canada, the murder rate has steadily declined.

  • It becomes a public spectacle

In an extremely public manner, executions are often undertaken with public hangings. All executions violate the right to life for no legitimate reason and contribute to the cruelty, inhumanity, and nature of punishment. Those carried out publicly are a gross affront to human dignity and cannot be tolerated.

  • It’s the absolute worst.

The two countries—Mongolia and Guinea—in the year 2017 abolished the death penalty for all crimes. Afterwards, with the majority, approximately 106 countries have abolished the death penalty for good. With a wave of opposition, there is a tiny majority who continue to execute the process.

Override the Right of Life

There are many arguments for and against the death penalty. Putting several arguments forward, the death penalty doesn’t deter crime. The argument for the death penalty must be maintained and, logically, aided rather than hindered by the number of supporters. It logically equates to factual knowledge, and it requires a value of judgement.

Considering the past years, there are many states that have carried out abolishments of the death penalty. Major states have halted the penalty either in the law or in practice. With a dramatic increase in execution in the year 2015, the global trend towards execution started. The world is considerably growing and some changes are being made. It is strongly believed that the death penalty should be demolished and made illegal by the justice system.

Final Thoughts

As will continue to be challenged sooner or later, the death penalty is a deeply problematic situation. The death penalty is considered cruel and absurd. The counterproductive method of punishment takes away the lives of innocents and is far too expensive to maintain. There is a lot of work yet to be done, and it’s time to end the death penalty once and for all.


Don’t victims of violent crimes and their families have a right to justice?

The victims of violent crimes and their families also have a right to justice. Victims should be treated with compassion and respect for their dignity. They also have the right to see the person responsible held to account without recourse to the death penalty.

If you kill someone else, don’t you deserve to die, too an eye for an eye?

With the intention of killing someone else, under any circumstances, the person will be guilty of murder and be liable for punishment. The person is also liable to a fine if harm is caused to a person by such an act.

What is the main issue with the death penalty?

When the death penalty is implemented, it is the ultimate denial of human rights. The death penalty is often considered inhumane. With a lot of disruption in families based on society, cast, and race, the main issue of the death penalty focuses on economic biases and irreversibility.

What are some of the key arguments for the death penalty?

The argument for the death penalty is described in many documents with the number of executions. The key arguments for the death penalty consider it to be inhumane and an effective crime deterrent.

What are your thoughts on the death penalty?

The death penalty violates crimes and their families. It increases the suffering of the concerned family members of the condemned person. It genuinely does not relieve the pain and creates physical and psychological cruelty.

What human rights does the death penalty violate?

The right to life and respect for humanity are considered to be options to punish someone. An implementation of a death penalty violation executes it to be right.

Can the death penalty reduce crime?

The impact of a death penalty execution is hardly ever imposed. When there is an execution of the death penalty, the crime rate decreases. With a large number of other factors, the penalty covers a large number of factors that affect the amount and kind of crime.

How ethical is the death penalty?

With a wider range of perspectives, the death sentence is defensible within established ethical frameworks. The interpretation of a serious understated crime, the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is unfair and arbitrary.

Author: Anchal Chauhan

Facebook Comments
Help us improve. Please rate this article:

Leave a Reply